Zip Code 95452: Population, Density, and Housing Trends from 2010 to 2022
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Population Density
SEARCH ARTICLES
DATA SOURCE
The historical population data for ZIP code 95452, which corresponds to Kenwood in California, reveals a fluctuating but overall increasing trend in population and population density from 2010 to 2022. With a land area of 13.9 square miles, the population density in this ZIP code has ranged from 77.63 people per square mile in 2010 to a peak of 132.37 people per square mile in 2015, before settling at 99.71 people per square mile in 2022.
Based on the 2022 population of 1,386 and an average household size of 2.61, the estimated number of housing units in the area is approximately 531. The population density of 99.71 people per square mile in 2022 suggests that the area falls within the rural classification, which typically features population densities between 50 and 500 people per square mile.
The lifestyle in this rural area is likely to be community-oriented, with a focus on local schools, small businesses, and outdoor activities. Residents may engage in hobby farming, horse ownership, and enjoy the natural environment. The living spaces in this area are expected to be larger compared to more densely populated areas, with lot sizes ranging from 1 to 5 acres.
Over the past decade, the population and population density have experienced some fluctuations, with notable increases in the early to mid-2010s followed by a decline and subsequent recovery. Despite these changes, the area has consistently remained within the rural classification range, indicating that the overall lifestyle and demographic characteristics have likely remained relatively stable.
In terms of urban development activity, the data suggests that the area has experienced some growth, as evidenced by the increasing population and population density. However, the growth has been moderate, and the area has maintained its rural character. The estimated number of housing units in 2022 (531) is relatively low compared to more urbanized areas, further supporting the notion that the area remains predominantly rural with limited urban development.
