Loading Content...
Loading Content...
Crime
Property Crime
Percent Owner Occupied
Median Income
Population
Anderson, located in Alabama, is a small community with some noteworthy property crime patterns. In 2010, the town reported a total of 8 property crimes. Over the years, the population has fluctuated, with 2,708 residents in 2010 decreasing to 2,304 by 2022, representing a 14.9% decline. This demographic shift provides an important backdrop for understanding the property crime trends in the area.
Examining burglary trends, the data shows 4 incidents in 2010, which equates to approximately 1.48 burglaries per 1,000 residents. This figure represented 0.02% of Alabama's total burglaries that year. Given the limited data point, it's challenging to discern a clear trend over time. However, the burglary rate relative to the population suggests a low incidence compared to larger urban areas.
Larceny-theft also saw 4 reported cases in 2010, mirroring the burglary rate at about 1.48 incidents per 1,000 residents. This accounted for 0.01% of the state's larceny-theft cases. As with burglary, the single data point restricts the ability to identify trends, but it indicates a relatively low occurrence rate for a town of this size.
Motor vehicle theft data shows zero reported incidents in 2010, suggesting this crime type was not a significant issue for the community at that time. The absence of motor vehicle thefts is notable and could be indicative of effective prevention measures or simply a reflection of the town's small size and possibly rural nature.
When examining potential correlations between property crime and other socioeconomic factors, the limited crime data makes it difficult to establish strong relationships. However, it's worth noting that the median income in Anderson has shown an overall increasing trend, rising from $38,680 in 2013 to $52,653 in 2022. This 36.1% increase in median income could potentially influence property crime rates, although more comprehensive crime data would be needed to confirm any correlation.
Applying predictive models to forecast property crime trends is challenging due to the limited historical data. However, if we extrapolate based on the overall population decline and the increasing median income, we might cautiously predict a continuation of low property crime rates in Anderson through 2029. This forecast assumes that the socioeconomic factors continue along their current trajectories and that no significant external factors dramatically alter the town's crime landscape.
In summary, Anderson presents an interesting case of a small Alabama community with notably low reported property crime rates based on the available 2010 data. The town's decreasing population coupled with rising median incomes suggests a potentially stable or improving economic situation, which could contribute to maintaining low crime rates. However, the limited nature of the crime data underscores the need for ongoing monitoring and data collection to better understand and address property crime trends in this community.