Loading Content...
Loading Content...
Crime
Property Crime
Percent Owner Occupied
Median Income
Population
Greenville, Ohio, presents an intriguing case study in property crime trends over the past decade. From 2010 to 2020, the city experienced a significant decrease in total property crimes, dropping from 482 to 186, representing a 61.4% reduction. This substantial decline occurred against a backdrop of a slight population decrease, with the city's population falling from 15,702 in 2010 to 15,280 in 2020, a 2.7% reduction.
Burglary rates in the city have shown a marked decline over the years. In 2010, there were 118 burglaries reported, which decreased to 27 by 2020, a 77.1% reduction. When adjusted for population, the burglary rate fell from 7.5 per 1,000 residents in 2010 to 1.8 per 1,000 in 2020. Interestingly, while the number of burglaries decreased, the city's share of state burglaries fluctuated. It peaked at 0.35% of state burglaries in 2013 before dropping to 0.11% in 2020, suggesting that the city's burglary reduction outpaced the state average. This trend indicates improved local safety measures or changing socio-economic factors within the city.
Larceny-theft, the most common property crime in the city, also saw a significant decrease. In 2010, there were 341 larceny-theft incidents, which dropped to 145 by 2020, a 57.5% reduction. The rate per 1,000 residents decreased from 21.7 in 2010 to 9.5 in 2020. The city's share of state larceny-theft incidents decreased from 0.22% in 2010 to 0.15% in 2020, indicating that the city's improvement in this category was somewhat in line with state trends. This reduction suggests enhanced community vigilance or improved security measures in retail and public spaces.
Motor vehicle theft in the city showed a fluctuating but overall decreasing trend. From 23 incidents in 2010, it dropped to 14 in 2020, a 39.1% reduction. The rate per 1,000 residents decreased from 1.5 in 2010 to 0.9 in 2020. However, the city's share of state motor vehicle thefts varied, peaking at 0.21% in 2015 before dropping to 0.10% in 2020. This suggests that while the city made progress in reducing vehicle thefts, the improvements were not consistently better than the state average.
Arson cases in the city showed significant volatility. From 6 incidents in 2010, it peaked at 23 in 2014 before dropping to 2 in 2020. The rate per 1,000 residents went from 0.38 in 2010 to 0.13 in 2020. The city's share of state arson cases fluctuated dramatically, reaching a high of 1.98% in 2018 before dropping to 0.31% in 2020. This volatility suggests that arson incidents, while relatively rare, can have a significant impact on the city's crime statistics when they occur.
Examining correlations between property crime trends and other factors reveals some interesting patterns. The decrease in property crimes coincided with a period of increasing median income in the city, rising from $36,705 in 2013 to $46,577 in 2022. This suggests that improved economic conditions may have contributed to the reduction in property crimes. Additionally, the percentage of owner-occupied housing remained relatively stable, around 60%, which may have contributed to community stability and reduced crime rates.
Applying predictive models to forecast property crime trends for the next five years (up to 2029) suggests a continued decrease in overall property crimes, albeit at a slower rate. Burglaries are projected to stabilize around 20-25 incidents per year, while larceny-theft may settle in the range of 130-140 annual incidents. Motor vehicle thefts are expected to remain relatively low, potentially averaging 15-20 cases per year. Arson cases, given their volatility, are harder to predict but are likely to remain in the single digits annually.
In summary, Greenville has made significant strides in reducing property crime rates over the past decade. The consistent decrease across all categories of property crime, particularly in burglary and larceny-theft, points to effective law enforcement strategies and community engagement. The correlation between rising median income and falling crime rates suggests that economic development may play a crucial role in maintaining this positive trend. As the city moves forward, maintaining these gains while addressing the occasional spikes in certain crime categories will be key to ensuring the continued safety and well-being of its residents.