Loading Content...
Population Trends and Rural Character of ZIP Code 95436 in Forestville, California
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Population Density
DATA SOURCE
United States Census Bureau: American Community Survey Data (ACS)
Based on the historical population data provided for ZIP code 95436 in Forestville, California, the area has experienced fluctuations in population and population density over the past decade. The population in 2022 was 5,853, with a corresponding population density of 256.15 people per square mile. This population density falls within the range typically associated with rural areas, which are characterized by larger living spaces, lower infrastructure density, and a community-oriented lifestyle centered around local schools and small businesses.
The estimated number of housing units in 2022, based on the national average household size of 2.61, is approximately 2,243. This suggests that the area likely consists of a mix of single-family homes and small multi-family dwellings, with lot sizes ranging from 1 to 5 acres, which is consistent with the rural classification.
The population and population density have varied over the years, with a general upward trend from 2010 to 2021, followed by a decline in 2022. The peak population was observed in 2021 at 6,389, with a population density of 279.61 people per square mile. Despite these fluctuations, the area has consistently maintained a rural character throughout the period, with population densities remaining below 500 people per square mile.
Given the rural nature of the area, residents likely enjoy a lifestyle that emphasizes outdoor activities, privacy, and self-sustainability. The community may be closely knit, with a focus on local events and initiatives. The lower population density also suggests that the area has limited public services and infrastructure compared to more urban areas.
In terms of urban development activity, the relatively stable population and consistently rural character of the area indicate that significant urbanization or densification is unlikely to have occurred during the period covered by the data. The area appears to have maintained its rural identity, with development likely limited to the construction of individual homes or small-scale community projects.
