Loading Content...
Population Density and Rural Characteristics of Zip Code 56314, Elmdale, Minnesota: 2010-2022
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Population Density
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Population Density
The zip code 56314 in Elmdale, Minnesota, is classified as remote rural based on population data from 2010 to 2022. The population density consistently remained below 35 people per square mile during this period, indicating a sparsely populated region.
The area's lifestyle is likely predominantly agricultural or centered around undeveloped land. Residents may value privacy and self-sufficiency, with large land areas per household. The low population density suggests homes are likely situated on large plots, potentially exceeding 5 acres each.
The population exhibited slight fluctuations but remained relatively stable, growing from 1,168 in 2010 to 1,293 in 2022. This 10.7% growth over 12 years indicates a slow, steady development pattern rather than rapid urbanization or suburban expansion.
The estimated 495 housing units for the 2022 population, spread across 37.9 square miles, further supports the remote rural classification. This equates to approximately 13 housing units per square mile, suggesting significant distances between neighbors and a lifestyle that likely involves considerable interaction with the natural environment.
Residents in this area likely engage in activities that utilize the open space and natural surroundings, such as farming, outdoor recreation, and possibly small-scale livestock rearing. The community is likely close-knit, with social interactions potentially centered around local institutions like schools, churches, or community centers, which serve as important gathering points in sparsely populated areas.
While the population has experienced some growth, the overall character of the area remains consistent with a remote rural setting. This suggests that any development occurring in the region is likely small-scale and in keeping with the existing low-density pattern, rather than indicating a shift towards more intensive land use or urbanization.
