Loading Content...
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Population Density
The Flower Park neighborhood in Santa Ana, California, experienced a significant population decline from 2010 to 2022. The population decreased from 7,535 to 4,714, a 37.4% reduction. This change indicates a transformation in the neighborhood's characteristics.
The population density decreased from 35,800 people per square mile in 2010 to 22,397 in 2022. Despite this decline, Flower Park remains a densely populated urban area. The current density suggests a compact living environment, likely characterized by multi-story apartment buildings and possibly some townhouses or small single-family homes.
This level of density typically supports an urban lifestyle with walkable streets, local businesses, and potential access to public transportation. Residents in such areas often have proximity to amenities like cafes, restaurants, and small retail shops within walking distance.
The consistent year-over-year population decrease could be attributed to factors such as changing housing preferences, economic pressures, or shifts in local employment opportunities. It is possible that some residents have moved to less dense areas.
Flower Park has maintained a relatively high population density despite its population loss, suggesting that the available living space has not expanded significantly. This could indicate that the neighborhood has a fixed housing stock, with vacancies increasing rather than a reduction in housing units.
Given the urban nature of the area, it is likely that the community faces challenges of dense city living, such as managing traffic, ensuring adequate green spaces, and maintaining a sense of community in a changing environment. The consistent population decline may also present challenges for local businesses and community services that rely on a stable customer base.
In conclusion, Flower Park appears to be an urban neighborhood in transition, maintaining its dense character while experiencing a significant reduction in population. This trend suggests ongoing changes in the area's socio-economic fabric and potentially in its built environment, which could have lasting impacts on the community's future development and character.