Loading Content...
Population and Housing Data for ZIP Code 96136 in Litchfield, California
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Population Density
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Population Density
Based on the historical population data for the ZIP code 96136, which corresponds to Litchfield in California, the area can be classified as remote rural. The population density has remained consistently low over the years, with the most recent data from 2022 showing a density of just 4.63 people per square mile. This is well below the threshold of 50 people per square mile that characterizes remote rural areas.
The estimated number of housing units in the ZIP code, corresponding to the 2022 population, is approximately 112, considering the national average household size of 2.61. Given the ZIP code's size of 63.12 square miles, this suggests that households in the area likely occupy large expanses of land, possibly more than 5 acres per household, which is typical of remote rural areas.
The lifestyle in this area is likely predominantly agricultural or undeveloped, with a focus on privacy and self-sustainability. Residents may engage in outdoor and recreational activities, taking advantage of the natural environment. The sparse population and minimal infrastructure suggest that public services and amenities are limited.
Over the past decade, the population in the ZIP code has remained relatively stable, with minor fluctuations. The population increased from 264 in 2010 to 292 in 2022, representing a growth of approximately 10.6 percent over the 12-year period. This slow growth rate is consistent with the characteristics of remote rural areas, which often experience minimal urban development and maintain a stable, low-density population.
In conclusion, the historical population data for ZIP code 96136 in Litchfield, California, indicates that the area is a remote rural one, with a sparse population, large land holdings per household, and a lifestyle centered around agriculture, privacy, and outdoor activities. The slow population growth and consistently low population density suggest that the area has experienced minimal urban development over the past decade and is likely to maintain its remote rural character in the near future.
