Loading Content...
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Population Density
Zip code 69165, located in Sutherland, Nebraska, is classified as a remote rural area based on population data and density figures. The population density has remained consistently below 5 people per square mile over the past decade, indicating a sparsely populated region.
The rural nature of this area significantly influences the lifestyle of its residents. Inhabitants likely experience considerable privacy and space, with households potentially situated on large land plots. This environment is conducive to agricultural activities, ranching, or other land-intensive pursuits. The low population density suggests that neighbors may be distant from one another, potentially fostering independence and self-reliance among residents.
Population figures have shown fluctuations over the years, peaking at 1,739 in 2013 and 2018, but generally remaining within a relatively stable range. However, a noticeable decline has occurred in recent years, with the population dropping to 1,540 in 2022. This trend may indicate outmigration, possibly due to limited economic opportunities or changes in agricultural practices.
Given the vast area of 402.35 square miles and the low population, public services and infrastructure are likely minimal and widely dispersed. Residents may need to travel significant distances for certain amenities or services. The community probably centers around essential institutions such as local schools, places of worship, or small businesses that serve as gathering points for the scattered population.
The estimated 590 housing units for the 2022 population suggest that dwellings are few and far between. This spatial arrangement would support a lifestyle that values outdoor activities, connection with nature, and possibly traditional rural occupations or hobbies.
In conclusion, zip code 69165 represents a remote rural area with very low population density. The lifestyle is characterized by spaciousness, privacy, and a close connection to the land, with community interactions possibly centered around key local institutions and events. The recent population decline may present challenges for maintaining services and community vitality in the future.