Loading Content...
Demographic Analysis of Zip Code 68941: Population Density and Rural Characteristics
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Population Density
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Population Density
Zip code 68941, which includes Glenvil in Nebraska, demonstrates characteristics of a remote rural area. The population density and historical data support this classification. In 2022, the population was 639 with a land area of 89.81 square miles, resulting in a population density of approximately 7.12 people per square mile. This indicates a sparsely populated region.
The population has shown stability over the past decade, ranging between 608 and 682 residents. This stability indicates minimal urban development and a consistent, low-density settlement pattern typical of remote rural areas in the American Midwest.
The lifestyle in this area is characterized by expansive open spaces. Residents likely experience considerable privacy and distance between households. Agricultural activities probably dominate the landscape, with large areas dedicated to farming or ranching. The low population density suggests that each household may have access to several acres of land, supporting a lifestyle that values self-sufficiency and connection to the natural environment.
Community services and infrastructure are likely limited. Residents may need to travel to larger towns for certain amenities or specialized services. The stable population suggests a tight-knit community where residents may know each other well and rely on community bonds for support and social interaction.
Outdoor activities and nature-based recreation are probably significant aspects of daily life, given the abundance of open space and natural landscapes. The area's remoteness may attract individuals and families seeking a quieter, slower-paced lifestyle away from urban centers, with a focus on agricultural pursuits, hobby farming, or enjoying the tranquility of rural living.
The population saw a slight increase in 2020, reaching 682 residents, but has since returned to levels consistent with previous years. This temporary fluctuation does not indicate any significant trend towards urbanization or densification. The area remains categorized as remote rural living, with no signs of substantial development or shift towards a more suburban or urban character.
