Loading Content...
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Median Income
Racial Distributions
Zip code 68301 in Adams, Nebraska, is classified as a "Low Diversity" community as of 2022. The population is 96% white, with minimal representation from other racial groups. The median income for this zip code in 2022 was $92,024, which exceeds the national median household income.
Over the past decade, Adams has maintained its "Low Diversity" status. The white population has remained above 95% from 2013 to 2022, with minor fluctuations. There have been no significant transitions between diversity categories during this period.
Subtle changes within the stable demographic composition include a slight decrease in the Hispanic population from 3% in 2013 to 1% in 2022, fluctuations in the Native American population between 0% and 2%, and a consistent 1% of individuals identifying as two or more races. These minor shifts do not indicate a trend towards increased diversity.
The median income in Adams has shown an upward trend over the past decade. In 2013, the median income was $67,489. By 2022, it had increased to $92,024, representing a growth of about 36% over nine years. The highest median income was recorded in 2021 at $104,148. This increase in median income occurred while the racial composition remained largely unchanged, suggesting that economic growth primarily benefited the existing white majority population.
Population trends have been relatively stable, with minor fluctuations. The population was 1,810 in 2013, peaked at 1,843 in 2018, and stood at 1,765 as of 2022. These minor population changes have not significantly impacted the racial composition or economic trends of the area.
The median income growth in Adams outpaces national averages, suggesting strong local economic conditions. The lack of racial diversity contrasts with national trends towards increasing diversity in many areas of the United States. The stability of the racial composition over a decade is notable, as many communities across the country have experienced more significant demographic shifts during this period.
Adams presents a picture of a stable, economically prosperous, but racially homogeneous community. The significant income growth without corresponding demographic changes suggests that the existing community has benefited from local economic developments, but has not attracted or integrated a more diverse population. This pattern raises questions about factors that might be limiting diversity in the area, such as housing policies, job markets, or cultural factors, which could be areas for further investigation.