Loading Content...
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Median Income
Racial Distributions
Zip code 67041, representing Elbing in Kansas, exhibits a unique demographic profile. From 2013 to 2022, this area is classified as having extremely Low Diversity, with a consistent White Majority. The community's population is reported as 1 person throughout the observed period, making it an atypical case for demographic analysis.
The racial composition of zip code 67041 has remained static from 2013 to 2022, consistently categorized as Low Diversity with a White Majority. This lack of change is unusual and likely due to the extremely small population size. The data shows no transition between diversity categories over the observed period.
Despite the unchanging racial demographics, there have been fluctuations in the median income. The median income increased from $59,263 in 2013 to a peak of $74,209 in 2018, representing an increase of about 25% over five years. After 2018, there was a decline, with the income dropping to $60,765 in 2020 and 2022, with a slight recovery to $69,906 in 2021. These economic shifts occurred without any corresponding change in racial demographics or population size.
The situation in Elbing is highly unusual and not representative of typical demographic trends. The reported population of 1 person over a decade is extremely rare. The consistent racial makeup (100% White) over a decade is also atypical, as most communities experience some demographic shifts over time. The income fluctuations are significant, with changes of over 20% in some years.
In comparison to national trends, most U.S. communities have been experiencing increasing diversity over the past decade, contrasting with the static racial composition here. The median household income for the U.S. in 2021 was $70,784, which is close to Elbing's 2021 figure of $69,906. However, the volatility of income in this zip code is much higher than typical national or regional trends.
The demographic and economic data for zip code 67041 presents a highly unusual case. With a population consistently reported as 1 person and unchanging racial demographics, it doesn't follow typical patterns of community evolution. The significant income fluctuations without corresponding demographic changes suggest that this area's economic situation is likely tied to individual circumstances rather than broader community trends. This case highlights the limitations of applying standard demographic analysis tools to extremely small populations and underscores the need for additional context when interpreting such unique datasets.