Loading Content...
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Median Income
Racial Distributions
The zip code 50648 in Jesup, Iowa, is classified as a "Low Diversity" community as of 2022. The population is 98% white, indicating minimal racial diversity. The median household income in 2022 was $77,859, suggesting a relatively affluent community compared to the national median income.
From 2013 to 2022, Jesup maintained its status as a "Low Diversity" community. The white population remained dominant, never falling below 96% of the total population. The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races increased from 1% in 2013 to 4% in 2020, before declining to 1% in 2022. The Hispanic population fluctuated between 0% and 1% throughout the decade. Other racial categories such as Asian, Black, and Native American had negligible representation.
The community experienced significant economic growth over the decade. Median household income increased from $63,567 in 2013 to $77,859 in 2022, representing a 22.5% growth over nine years. The peak median income was reached in 2021 at $81,680, showing a slight decline in 2022. Despite the economic growth, the population declined slightly from 4,611 in 2013 to 4,260 in 2022.
The stable, predominantly white demographic composition coincides with steady economic growth. This could suggest a link between the community's homogeneity and its economic stability and growth. However, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, and other factors not visible in this data set could be influencing these trends.
Jesup appears to be maintaining its homogeneous demographic composition, in contrast to many urban and suburban areas that have experienced significant demographic shifts over the same period. The economic growth in Jesup outpaces the national average. The national median household income grew from $51,939 in 2013 to $70,784 in 2021, an increase of about 36% over eight years. Jesup's growth of 22.5% over nine years is somewhat slower than the national rate, but it started from a higher baseline in 2013.
Jesup presents a case of a "Low Diversity" community that has maintained its demographic composition while experiencing steady economic growth. This stability in both demographics and economics distinguishes it from many other communities that have undergone more significant changes in the past decade. Future research could explore the factors contributing to this stability and its implications for community dynamics and future development.