Loading Content...
Demographic Analysis of Zip Code 28524: Predominantly White Population in Davis, North Carolina
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Median Income
Racial Distributions
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Median Income
Racial Distributions
The zip code 28524 in Davis, North Carolina, exhibits low diversity as of 2022, with a white population of 91%. The median income in this area increased to $91,885 in 2022. The population decreased from 85 in 2010 to 33 in 2022, which may affect the reliability of these statistics due to the small sample size.
From 2013 to 2022, Davis maintained low diversity. The white population ranged from 98% to 100% for most of the decade. In 2021 and 2022, a small percentage (13% in 2021 and 6% in 2022) identified as two or more races, potentially indicating the beginning of a transitional community on a small scale.
The median income in Davis fluctuated significantly over the years. From 2013 to 2019, it ranged from about $50,000 to $55,000. In 2019, it increased to $71,637, followed by a decline to $37,223 in 2020. The 2022 data shows an increase to $91,885. These fluctuations may be partly due to the small population size.
The population decline from 85 in 2010 to 33 in 2022 is a critical factor. This depopulation could influence both demographic and economic statistics, as the remaining residents may not represent broader regional trends.
The demographic makeup of Davis contrasts with national trends towards increasing diversity. The persistent low diversity categorization suggests that this area has not experienced the demographic shifts seen in many other parts of the United States.
The 2022 median income of $91,885 is higher than the national median household income of $70,784 in 2021. However, this figure should be interpreted cautiously due to the small population.
The population decline in Davis is noteworthy. While many rural areas in the United States have experienced population loss, a decrease of over 60% in just over a decade is extreme and may indicate unique local factors affecting this community.
Davis shows signs of potential transition with a recent small increase in racial diversity and significant income fluctuations. However, the extremely small and declining population makes it challenging to draw definitive conclusions about broader trends. The area remains predominantly white with low diversity, and the economic situation appears volatile, possibly due to the small sample size rather than larger economic forces.
