Loading Content...
Demographic Analysis of Spring Garden, California: A Predominantly White Community
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Median Income
Racial Distributions
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Median Income
Racial Distributions
Spring Garden, California, is a community with a population of 24 as of 2022. The city is categorized as having "Low Diversity," with 96% of the population identifying as white. The median income in 2022 was $58,120, showing a decrease from previous years.
Spring Garden has maintained its status as a "Low Diversity" community from 2013 to 2022. The white population has remained the dominant racial group, with percentages ranging from 86% to 96%. There has been a slight increase in the proportion of white residents over time.
The median income in Spring Garden has fluctuated significantly. It peaked in 2017 at $84,881 and has since decreased, reaching $58,120 in 2022. This represents a decrease of about 31.5% from the peak. This economic decline has not corresponded with significant changes in racial demographics.
Population figures have remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 14 and 27 residents over the decade. The small population size makes the community sensitive to individual household changes, which could explain some of the income volatility.
Spring Garden appears to be becoming slightly less diverse over time, contrary to national trends of increasing diversity. The declining median income is notable, especially when compared to California's generally rising income levels in many areas.
Based on observed trends, Spring Garden will likely maintain its "Low Diversity" status in the near future. The community shows no signs of transitioning to a more diverse demographic makeup. The economic outlook is less certain. If the downward trend in median income continues, it could potentially lead to demographic changes.
In the long term, if external factors such as changes in local industry or housing market shifts occur, a transition to a more diverse community might begin. However, given the current trends and the small size of the community, such a transition would likely be slow.
Spring Garden presents a case of a small, homogeneous community facing economic challenges while maintaining its demographic composition. The coming years will be crucial in determining whether this trend continues or if broader regional influences begin to impact its demographic and economic landscape.
