Loading Content...
Demographic Analysis of Norton Neighborhood, Topeka: Population Density and Housing Trends (2014-2022)
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Population Density
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Population Density
The Norton neighborhood in Topeka, Kansas, exhibits population fluctuations from 2014 to 2022. In 2022, the population density was 7,795.96 people per square mile, categorizing it as a Light Urban Neighborhood. This classification indicates a compact living environment with low to mid-rise apartments and developed infrastructure.
Population trends show significant variations. The neighborhood reached its peak population of 1,115 residents in 2014, followed by a general decline. The most substantial decrease occurred between 2018 and 2019, with the population dropping from 1,008 to 920 residents. A recovery occurred in 2020, increasing the population to 1,022. As of 2022, the population is 969, indicating a slight decrease from 2020.
These fluctuations suggest a dynamic urban environment potentially influenced by factors such as local economic changes, housing market shifts, or urban renewal projects. The high population density implies resident access to urban amenities, including public transportation, shopping districts, and cultural venues in close proximity.
The estimated 371 housing units for the 2022 population, based on the national average household size, suggests a predominance of multi-unit dwellings. This housing composition aligns with the urban character of the neighborhood, where space efficiency is important.
Norton's location within Topeka, the capital city of Kansas, likely influences the neighborhood's character, potentially attracting government workers, students, or professionals seeking proximity to state institutions and urban conveniences.
Despite recent population decline, the neighborhood maintains a substantial urban density. This suggests Norton continues to offer advantages of city living, such as walkability and access to diverse services, while possibly undergoing changes affecting its residential appeal or capacity. The slight population decrease might indicate a shift in housing preferences or economic factors influencing residency in the area.
In conclusion, Norton presents an evolving urban neighborhood, balancing high-density living demands with challenges of maintaining a stable population. Future development and population trends will likely depend on local urban planning initiatives and broader economic factors affecting Topeka and the surrounding region.
