Loading Content...
Demographic Analysis of Eagle River, Michigan (ZIP Code 49950): Population Density and Rural Characteristics
CATEGORY
Demographics
DATA
Population
Population Density
Loading Content...
Demographics
Population
Population Density
The Eagle River in Michigan (zip code 49950) exhibits characteristics of a remote rural environment based on population data and density figures. The population density remains consistently around 3 people per square mile from 2010 to 2022, which is substantially lower than typical rural areas.
The area encompasses 464.74 square miles with a small population of 1,383 in 2022, indicating a sparsely populated region. This suggests a landscape primarily composed of open spaces, likely including large areas of undeveloped land, forests, or agricultural regions.
Population trends show minor fluctuations over the years, with a peak of 1,515 residents in 2014-2016, followed by a gradual decline to 1,383 in 2022. This pattern may indicate limited economic opportunities or an aging population, which are common in remote rural areas.
The extremely low population density suggests that residents of Eagle River likely experience a lifestyle characterized by significant privacy and self-reliance. The environment would be conducive to outdoor activities and recreational pursuits that utilize the natural surroundings. The sparse population also implies limited local infrastructure and services, with residents potentially needing to travel long distances for certain amenities or healthcare.
The estimated 530 housing units, based on the 2022 population and national average household size, spread across the large area further emphasizes the remote nature of this region. This distribution likely results in substantial distances between neighbors, fostering a lifestyle where independence and self-sufficiency are essential.
Regarding urban development, the consistent low population density over the years indicates minimal urbanization or suburban expansion. The slight population decrease in recent years suggests a lack of significant new development or influx of residents. This area appears to maintain its remote rural character, with little evidence of transition towards more densely populated classifications.
